Page 2 of 3

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 24th, 2004, 5:02 pm
by ArcticEd
Well, I would think it obvious that a 16 inch wise tunnel wouldn't just bolt up to a bulkhead build for one that's only 14 inches wide... But hey, your post, your world.........

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 24th, 2004, 10:18 pm
by BigDXLT
Some people called the Pro-X "the same as the edge" because the body work was similar. :p

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 12:06 am
by dave583
[quote]Why won't I last long Kawi? [/quote]

We can already tell you are a huge dumb ass. You dont belong hear on the trasher board you need to be seeing about getting your GED.

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 12:21 am
by yammyhaa
Does it really matter whats modified on those pieces of junk?

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 12:27 am
by SNOBALLZ
the word "modify" in Japanese means new thumb warmer switch!
LMFAO

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 1:25 am
by zrcat
LOL F3600, got shot down and burst into flames real fast didn't you. LMAO.......

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 1:35 am
by T'NT340rider
F3600, althought the "M" looks similar to the "F" chassis, they share very little parts. Same thing with the Ski-Doo "RT" Vs "REV", they look similar, but the RT only shares 17parts with the MXZ REV. and the new Polaris fusion is a good looking sled, but looks like a combination of REV, Firecat, and RX1, to make that, althought im not saying its a bad sled, in fact it looks like it will kick arse on the sno-x curcuit.

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 2:38 am
by Joshua
[quote]......and the redline on a 1000cc twin would be what, 5500 RPM?[/quote]

Snoballz,
The volumetric efficiency is much higher at lower RPM for a twin; therefore the power is available at a lower RPM. This does not make a twin inferior, rather more torquey. I'd rather have power down low (where it is usable) than up high.

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 3:00 am
by F3600
The Cat Faithful are up in arms. Look out.

Dave - your a typical Chicago ass monkey. Probably one of those limp wristed limo driver's who shuttles me around when I'm in Oak Brook.

Listen to you wads, "actually the RT or M uses 17 of these parts, and 35 of those new parts, yack, yack , yack. Yeah I'm sure you've seen the parts list. Not that I have either but if you think they are not working off the same platform your a chump and a sheep.

Good thing I have my asbestos underware on eh ZR ;}

Somebody call VBand MMM quick, there tunnels won't bolt up, it requires a complete redesign. LOL

Cat, DOO and the "Mythical New Chassis"

PostPosted: February 25th, 2004, 3:02 am
by DooSki7c
The RT chassis only shares a whole 20 parts w/ the REV chassis...steering post is the same.