New sleds usually get all the talk through the year....

by **Xtreme XC** » February 24th, 2006, 1:30 am

But the Phazer is dead after just 1 week???

by **Rick27** » February 24th, 2006, 1:39 am

People have seen it in pictures, now waiting to see it in person and hopefully try it out in person. It is hard to say anymore till it is ridden. Notice the Jagwad has slowed down also and it didn't get any better looking either.

by **MM700** » February 24th, 2006, 1:48 am

[quote=Xtreme XC]But the Phazer is dead after just 1 week???[/quote]

What fun is it to pick on an entry level sled???...Honestly what's next??..let's trash the 120's??...lol

In the same token...the new Iq's lasted all of one week on the front page, and I have yet to see anybody even care enough to trash em...and the Polaris 4 strokes are such a joke...why trash em???..it's almost unfair..kinda like an 8th grader bullying a kindergartner.

by **Xtreme XC** » February 24th, 2006, 4:09 am

I am trashin the 120's.... the phazer! All 37 ft/lbs torque of it!

by **die_hard_catrider05** » February 24th, 2006, 4:11 am

It'll be the same when it finally comes out the public... dead after a week

by **Smack** » February 24th, 2006, 4:11 am

In all fairness, most 120s have more torque than that.

by **REVRECK** » February 24th, 2006, 4:28 am

both the phazer and the jag have sumthin in common,asthetically challenged!!

by **Smack** » February 24th, 2006, 4:30 am

While the Jag IS ugly, it looks like a prom queen next to the Phazer. The new Phazer is an insult to the old Phazer name.

by **Rick27** » February 24th, 2006, 4:33 am

Couldn't tell Die Hard but assume your talking about the Jag!!!!!!

by **Luv2sled** » February 24th, 2006, 5:07 am

When was the last time anyone even talked about Polaris on this site?...that's pretty sad..LOL